← Back to ranking

Model result · rank #8

Gemini 3.5 Flash

OpenRouter · extra-high reasoning · Hard Intelligence. Public result card with the model’s overall score, lane measurements, runtime/cost telemetry, and ranking formula.

Overall score83.38

Rank #8

Full / Agentic88.79

Full rank #6

SWE MVP73.59

SWE rank #14

Hard Intelligence87.75

Hard rank #5

Measured cost$1.646

100.0% reliability

Overall

All-around publication view

Score83.38
Formulamean(Full, SWE, Hard Intelligence)
BasisOpenRouter · extra-high reasoning · Hard Intelligence

The overall score averages the measured major lanes while keeping each source measurement visible.

Lane 01

Full / Agentic benchmark

Final88.79
Capability93.55
Agentic91.87
Pass rate93.0%
Prompts43

This lane captures instruction following, structured behavior, tool discipline, and general agentic reliability.

Lane 02

Software engineering MVP

SWE score73.59
Focused final72.96
Capability70.23
Daily driver73.50
Prompts24

This lane is closer to implementation usefulness: source handling, architecture cleanliness, and deliverable quality.

Lane 03

Hard Intelligence diagnostic

Hard score87.75
Active inquiry81.42
Online adaptation97.50
Self-repair82.08
Authority integrity90.00

Hard Intelligence measures active inquiry, online adaptation, evidence-driven self-repair, and authority/salience integrity.

Telemetry

Runtime economics

Total cost$1.646
Cost / scored item$0.022
Seconds / timed item9.13s
Runtime coverage100.0%
Recorded tokens / item8.4k
Token coverage100.0%

Cost, time, and token basis are normalized telemetry. They explain tradeoffs; they do not overwrite the capability score yet.

Interpretation

Why this result lands here.

The model is stronger in the Full/Agentic lane than in the SWE lane; the overall score is therefore shown with both component lanes visible. Hard Intelligence score is 87.75 and contributes to the overall score alongside Full/Agentic and SWE. Hard Intelligence is published alongside Full/Agentic and SWE for the current ranking.